|
by Konrad Schmidt - St. Paul, MN
In 1983, my interest in native fishes and unusual species distributions led me to the Upper Mississippi National Wildlife and Fish Refuge in southeastern Minnesota. The sparse information available at that time indicated this portion of the Mississippi River, backwaters, and tributaries supported many fishes at the northern limits of their ranges. My initial forays were extremely limited in scope and targeted very few species. The bluntnose darter (Etheostoma chlorosomum), which had not been reported from Minnesota waters in four decades, was the Holy Grail of my early quests. Even though no one has since found this species, my efforts did sample several fishes which I had never collected before and also established new localities for others listed endangered, threatened, or special concern in Minnesota and Wisconsin.
In 1985, I landed a seasonal job with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) conducting fish surveys in waterfowl production areas (WPA). The objective of this study was to identify units with large rough fish populations (usually carp and bullheads) which had degraded waterfowl habitat and water quality by grazing and uprooting submerged plants and increasing turbidity. Definitely not the most glamourous job for a fish biolo gist, but I loved it and felt like a pioneer on a frontier exploring places which had never been surveyed. The experience also made me keenly aware of the lack of information available for nongame species which typically comprise the bulk of all fish communities. This spawned an idea to begin fish surveys on large tracts of public lands which contained aquatic habitats and refuges topped my list of likely candidates. However, nongame species to this day remain a low priority in the funding forum which required tapping an all too common source - OOPS: Out of Pocket Support.
Generally, each refuge was sampled twice (spring and fall) with seines, kicknets, and minnow traps. Back pack electroshockers were used in rip-rapped areas. However, the Upper Mississippi River remains an ongoing study because of the unique species found there. I also received some welcomed assistance in this refuge from U.S. Fish and Service and Minnesota and Wisconsin DNR fisheries biologists who brought their boom shocking boats. Voucher specimens of every species collected in surveys conducted since 1990 have been deposited in the James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History fish collection which is housed on the St. Paul campus of the University of Minnesota. Finally, field data and narrative reports of survey results have been provided to refuge headquarters at the completion of each study.
Refuge Summaries
Eight refuges and one wetland district were surveyed from 1983 through 1996 (See map). This included 644 samples conduct ed over 216 days in 18 major watersheds, 16 Minnesota counties, and 5 Wisconsin counties.
- Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge is in northwestern Minnesota near Thief River Falls. The refuge was established in 1937 and encompasses 61,449 acres. Aquatic habitats consist of 19 impoundments, 5 lakes, and channelized reaches of the Thief and Mud Rivers.
- Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge is in west-central Minnesota near Ortonville on the South Dakota border. The refuge was established in 1971 and encompasses 10,795 acres. Aquatic habitats include the Minnesota River, tributary streams, wetlands, impoundments, and abandoned granite quarries.
- Crane Meadows National Wildlife Refuge is in central Minnesota near Little Falls. The refuge was established in 1993 and will eventually encompass 13,540 acres. Aquatic habitats include Rice and Skunk Lakes, Platte River, and Buckman, Little Rock, Rice, and Skunk Creeks.
- Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge is headquartered in Bloomington which is part of the Twin Cities Metro Area. The refuge was established in 1976 and will eventually encompass 24,000 acres along the lower 72 miles of the Minnesota River from Le Sueur to Fort Snelling State Park. Aquatic habitats include the mainstem Minnesota River (natural and navigation channels and associated cutoffs) and floodplain marshes, lakes, and tributary streams.
- The Morris Wetland District is headquartered near Morris in west-central Minnesota. The district was established in 1963, and in 1985, encompassed approximately 42,000 acres scattered over 266 WPAs in Big Stone, Lac qui Parle, Pope, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, and Yellow Medicine Counties. Aquatic habitats include swamps, marsh, and lakes which have closed basins or connected to drainages via streams and ditches. Note: Surveys were conducted solely with passive gears (i.e., gillnets, trapnets, and minnow traps) and in only 40 WPAs which included five of the district's seven counties.
- Rice Lake National Wildlife Refuge is in east-central Minnesota near McGregor. The refuge was established in 1935 and encompasses 18,127 acres. Aquatic habitats include the 4,500 acre Rice Lake, several miles of the Rice River, impoundments, small lakes, and wetlands.
- Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge is in central Minnesota near Princeton. The refuge was established in 1965 and encompasses approximately 30,600 acres. Aquatic habitats include Battle Brook, several miles of the St. Francis River, channelized Snake River, and 23 impoundments.
- Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge is in northwestern Minnesota near Detroit Lakes. The refuge was established in 1938 and encompasses approximately 43,000 acres. Aquatic habitats include the Buffalo and Otter Tail Rivers and several lakes, wetlands, and impoundments.
- The Upper Mississippi River Wildlife and Fish Refuge is headquartered in Winona in southeastern Minnesota. The refuge was established in 1924 and encompasses 195,000 acres which spans 284 miles of the Mississippi River from Wabasha, MN to Rock Island, IL. Aquatic habitats include the mainstem Mississippi River (navigation channel and pools), floodplain backwaters, and tributary streams. Note: Surveys were conducted in this refuge from the confluence of Wisconsin's Chippewa River to the Minnesota-Iowa border. However, this does include 1987 surveys from the adjacent Trempealeau National Wildlife Refuge in Wisconsin and were conducted while I was employed with the USFWS - Winona Fisheries Resources Office.
Ecological Niches
Before diving in, a brief course in ecology is in order to understand the scope of this information. Whether the topic is aquatic or terrestrial ecosystems, each species plays several roles or fills many niches in a community. Although there is never universal consensus among biologists when classifying species to specific groups, both empty and filled niches can tell a great deal about the overall health of a community and the quality of the habitat it depends on. The Index of biotic integrity (IBI) examines several facets or metrics of fish communities to assess stream water quality and habitat. In order to use this relatively new toy, biologists must be cornered and pinned down to put a label on many species. This always require some fine tuning, but does provide the tools to eventually score streams from pristine to poor. The niches I looked at were not all environmental indicators, but included tolerance, feeding, spawning, and preferred stream size and habitat.
- TOLERANCE: A community comprised of several species intolerant to pollution, siltation, turbidity, and habitat modification (e.g., channelizaton) would reflect high quality conditions. However, another community dominated with one or two tolerant species would indicate severely degraded conditions.
- FEEDING: Groups include omnivores, insectivores, top carnivores, filter feeders, generalist feeders, and parasites. Omnivores can suffice on a diverse diet which includes both plants and animals and serves as an advantage in degraded conditions with a disrupted food base. Insectivores have a much more restricted diet which is dependent on a healthy aquatic insect community and their habitat. Top carnivores which are also called piscivores feed on other vertebrates (e.g., fish) and crayfish and occupy the highest level in a healthy community's food chain. Filter feeders are planktivores which sieve small plants and animals from the water column. Generalist feeders are sometimes also referred to as generalist invertivores whose diet is often high in animal matter. However, these species possess the same advantage as omnivores in adapting to a broader range of items when degrading conditions disrupt the food base. Herbivores are the grazers in the fish community and feed on plants and algae. Parasites are restricted to the parasitic lampreys which extracts a blood meal from another fish which serves as an unwilling host.
- SPAWNING: Groups include simple lithophilous, simple miscellaneous, complex - parental care, and complex - no care. Simple lithophils broadcast their eggs which come in contact with and develop in bottom substrates. These eggs require clean gravel or cobble for successful reproduction and simple lithophilic species decline in streams with heavy silt loads. Simple miscellaneous spawners have buoyant, adhesive, or fast developing eggs which have little or no contact with substrates. Both complex spawners either build nests or lay adhesive eggs on the undersurfaces of rocks and are also not dependent on clean substrates.
- PREFERRED STREAM SIZE AND HABITAT: Even though there is overlap, many fishes typically inhabit specific parts of a watershed from small headwaters streams to large rivers. The same general rule applies to habitats where certain fishes prefer riffles, others pools, and some both. Finally pioneers are the first species to re-invade suitable habitats following a disturbance (e.g., drought or fish kill).
Results
Overall, the surveys sampled 63,622 fish representing 100 species in 23 families. This included four Minnesota and eight Wisconsin fishes listed endangered, threatened, or special concern; and 11 species which have very limited distributions in Minnesota (Tables 1 and 2). The following community descriptions are summaries and only species comprising major components of each group are reported. For more detailed information on species composition, narrative reports and data summaries should be requested from the refuge headquarters. However, a nominal fee may be charged to cover photocopying and postage costs.
Table 1. Fish community overview for Minnesota refuges and waterfowl production areas. The first number represents the species total and the second is percent composition of the total catch. * - Environmental indicator frequently used for the Index of Biotic Integrity.
|
AGASSIZ |
BIG STONE |
CRANE MEADOWS |
ECOLOGICAL NICHE: |
|
|
|
FEEDING |
Filter Feeder |
- |
- |
- |
Generalist Feeder |
- |
2 - 7.6 |
2 - 4.2 |
Herbivore |
1 - 2.5 |
2 - 7.8 |
- |
Insectivore* |
11 - 72.7 |
23 - 44.1 |
17 - 63.1 |
Omnivore* |
3 - 24.8 |
4 - 39.1 |
4 - 5.9 |
Parasite |
- |
- |
- |
Top Carnivore* |
2 - <0.1 |
4 - 1.1 |
5 - 26.8 |
SPAWNING |
Complex Spawner (Parental Care) |
8 - 92.9 |
16 - 64.3 |
14 - 68.2 |
Complex Spawner (No Parental Care) |
1 - 0.1 |
3 - 15.5 |
2 - 5.1 |
Simple Lithophilic Spawner* |
3 - 0.7 |
8 - 10.0 |
7 - 19.1 |
Simple Miscellaneous Spawner |
5 - 6.3 |
8 - 10.0 |
5 - 7.6 |
TOLERANCE |
Intolerant* |
2 - 0.6 |
7 - 7.1 |
5 - 25.8 |
Tolerant* |
3 - 24.8 |
5 - 42.9 |
5 - 9.9 |
STREAM SIZE |
Headwater |
3 - 68.7 |
2 - 3.0 |
2 - 3.5 |
Large River |
1 - 0.1 |
3 - 0.5 |
1 - 0.5 |
Pioneer |
2 - 24.2 |
5 - 53.2 |
4 - 17.4 |
PREFERRED HABITAT |
Pool |
14 - 75.2 |
21 - 30.7 |
16 - 63.4 |
Riffle |
- |
3 - 2.8 |
2 - 2.0 |
Pool and Riffle |
3 - 24.8 |
11 - 66.2 |
10 - 34.6 |
OVERALL RESULTS |
Families |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Species |
17 |
35 |
28 |
Exotics |
- |
1 - 0.5 |
1 - 0.4 |
Total Catch |
10152 |
2011 |
1441 |
Minnesota Listed Fishes |
- |
- |
- |
Minnesota Limited Fishes |
- |
1 |
- |
Wisconsin Listed Fishes |
- |
- |
- |
Samples |
39 |
35 |
21 |
Year(s) |
1994 |
1992 |
1996 |
Table 1. Continued.
|
Minnesota Valley |
Morris Wetland |
Rice Lake |
Ecological Niche |
|
|
|
FEEDING |
Filter Feeder |
1 - 0.2 |
- |
- |
Generalist Feeder |
2 - 2.2 |
- |
1 - 0.1 |
Herbivore |
3 - 1.1 |
2 - 1.3 |
1 - 65.4 |
Insectivore* |
24 - 62.4 |
9 - 50.7 |
10 - 19.8 |
Omnivore* |
6 - 32.6 |
4 - 44.0 |
3 - 10.8 |
Parasite |
- |
- |
- |
Top Carnivore* |
8 - 1.5 |
3 - 4.0 |
4 - 3.4 |
SPAWNING |
Complex Spawner (Parental Care) |
17 - 33.3 |
9 - 95.5 |
10 - 27.0 |
Complex Spawner (No Parental Care) |
3 - 2.2 |
- |
1 - 0.1 |
Simple Lithophilic Spawner* |
8 - 16.7 |
2 - 0.5 |
2 - 2.7 |
Simple Miscellaneous Spawner
|
15 - 47.7 |
7 - 4.0 |
6 - 69.7 |
TOLERANCE |
Intolerant* |
4 - 16.0 |
1 - 0.1 |
1 - 0.4 |
Tolerant* |
5 - 33.7 |
4 - 82.2 |
4 - 13.3 |
STREAM SIZE |
Headwater |
2 - 4.9 |
2 - 12.0 |
2 - 66.7 |
Large River |
9 - 16.5 |
1 - 0.4 |
1 - 0.1 |
Pioneer |
5 - 19.0 |
2 - 42.3 |
3 - 10.9 |
PREFERRED HABITAT |
Pool |
29 - 80.4 |
16 - 57.6 |
13 - 85.7 |
Riffle |
2 - 1.2 |
- |
- |
Pool and Riffle |
13 - 18.4 |
2 - 42.4 |
6 -13.8 |
OVERALL RESULTS |
Families |
14 |
8 |
10 |
Species |
44 |
18 |
19 |
Exotics |
2 - 22.7 |
1 - 1.5 |
- |
Total Catch |
5013 |
10549 |
1859 |
Minnesota Listed Fishes |
- |
- |
- |
Minnesota Limited Fishes |
- |
- |
- |
Wisconsin Listed Fishes |
- |
- |
- |
Samples |
28 |
38 |
38 |
Year(s) |
1990 |
1985 |
1993 |
Table 1. Continued.
|
Sherburne |
Tamarac |
Upper Mississippi |
Ecological Niche |
|
|
|
FEEDING |
Filter Feeder |
- |
- |
3 - 3.3 |
Generalist Feeder |
2 - 0.7 |
2 - 11.0 |
2 - 3.2 |
Herbivore |
3 - 23.6 |
1 - 2.6 |
4 - 0.6 |
Insectivore* |
22 - 52.1 |
21 - 53.8 |
52 - 66.1 |
Omnivore* |
5 - 22.2 |
4 - 31.6 |
9 - 7.4 |
Parasite |
- |
- |
2 - 0.1 |
Top Carnivore* |
5 - 1.4 |
4 - 1.0 |
19 - 17.8 |
SPAWNING |
Complex Spawner (Parental Care) |
16 - 58.4 |
15 - 50.5 |
25 - 36.8 |
Complex Spawner (No Parental Care) |
3 - 0.9 |
2 - 5.8 |
6 - 2.7 |
Simple Lithophilic Spawner* |
7 - 4.1 |
4 - 11.3 |
24 - 29.5 |
Simple Miscellaneous Spawner |
11 - 36.6 |
11 - 32.3 |
31 - 25.8 |
TOLERANCE |
Intolerant* |
6 - 3.7 |
8 - 25.5 |
22 - 8.8 |
Tolerant* |
5 - 47.2 |
4 - 34.6 |
5 - 8.0 |
STREAM SIZE |
Headwater |
3 - 24.9 |
3 - 19.1 |
4 - 2.5 |
Large River |
3 - 0.2 |
1 - <0.1 |
34 - 37.7 |
Pioneer
|
5 - 15.1 |
5 - 36.7 |
5 - 6.2 |
PREFERRED HABITAT |
Pool |
23 - 80.5 |
21 - 55.0 |
55 - 75.9 |
Riffle |
2 - 0.7 |
1 - 6.1 |
11 - 2.3 |
Pool and Riffle |
12 - 18.7 |
10 - 38.7 |
21 - 17.1 |
OVERALL RESULTS |
Families |
9 |
9 |
22 |
Species |
37 |
32 |
91 |
Exotics |
1 - 5.6 |
- |
2 - 2.0 |
Total Catch |
13552 |
4499 |
14546 |
Minnesota Listed Fishes |
- |
- |
4 |
Minnesota Limited Fishes |
- |
- |
10 |
Wisconsin Listed Fishes |
- |
- |
8 |
Samples |
156 |
64 |
225 |
Year(s) |
1988-1989 |
1992 |
1983-1996 |
The Agassiz fish community had the greatest composition of insectivores at 72.7% and headwater species at 68.7%. However, brook sticklebacks were the dominant species in both groups. Other major groups included the complex spawners - parental care at 92.9% (fathead minnows and brook sticklebacks) and pool species at 75.2% (brook sticklebacks). Overall, the refuge surveys sampled 10,152 fish representing 17 species in 7 families
Big Stone's fish community had the most complex spawners - no care at 15.5% (central stoneroller, hornyhead chub, and creek chub), pioneers at 53.2%, and pool-riffle species at 66.2% with fathead minnows dominating both groups. Omnivores were also highly represented at 39.1% (fathead minnows). Overall, 2011 fish were sampled representing 35 species in 8 families. This included the greater redhorse which has a limited distribution in Minnesota and was collected in the Yellow Bank River.
Crane Meadows edged out Tamarac in composition of intolerant species at 25.8% and the most top carnivores at 26.8% with rock bass representing the majority in both groups. Insectivores were also abundant at 63.1% (central mudminnows, johnny darters, common shiners, and tadpole madtoms). Overall, 1441 fish were sampled representing 28 species in 9 families.
Minnesota Valley had the largest percentage of exotics at 22.7% (common carp). However, insectivores (emerald shiners and Iowa darters), large river species (emerald shiners), and pool species (emeralds, Iowas, and carp) were also common at 62.4%, 16.5%, and 80.4% respectively. Overall, 5013 fish were sampled representing 44 species in 14 families. This includes the unusual occurrence of the weed shiner in the lower Minnesota River at the mouth of Rilely Creek. Note: Additional 1994 surveys were conducted in Eagle Creek, but these results are not reported in the refuge narrative or overall species list (Table 2). Significant finds include the American brook lamprey (Lampetra appendix) which had not been reported from the Minnesota drainage in half a century, and the burbot, which the Bell Museum's fish collection revealed was the first occurrence of this species reported from the drainage.
The Morris Wetland District had the highest composition of tolerant species at 82.2% (fathead minnows and black bullheads), omnivores at 44.0% (fatheads), and complex spawners - parental care at 95.5% (fatheads, black bullheads, and brook sticklebacks). Overall, 10,549 fish were sampled representing 18 species in 8 families.
Rice Lake had the most herbivores at 65.4%, simple miscellaneous spawners at 69.7%, and pool species at 85.7% with northern redbelly dace dominating all three groups. Headwater species at 66.7% was another major component in this community, but again, represented by the same fish. Overall, 1859 fish were sampled and represented 19 species in 10 families.
Sherburne had a large pool component at 80.5% with northern redbelly dace and black bullheads comprising the bulk of the group. Overall, the surveys, which spanned two years, sampled 13,552 fish representing 37 species in 9 families.
Tamarac had the most generalist feeders at 11.0% (creek chubs) and riffle species at 6.1% (blacknose dace). Intolerant species were also well represented at 8 fishes and 25.5% of the total catch (Iowa darters). This was second only to the Upper Mississippi in species and Crane Meadows in composition. Overall, 4499 fish were sampled representing 32 species in 9 families.
The Upper Mississippi had the greatest abundance of filter feeders at 3.3% (gizzard shad), insectivores at 66.1% (emerald shiners and bluegills), parasites at 0.1% (chestnut and silver lampreys), top carnivores at 17.8% (largemouth bass), simple lithophilic spawners at 29.5% and large river species at 37.7.0% (emerald shiners in both groups). In numbers, this refuge also had the most intolerant species at 22, filter feeders at 3, insectivores at 52, omnivores at 9, top carnivores at 19, both complex spawners: parental care at 25, and no care at 6, simple lithophilous spawners at 24, simple miscellaneous spawners at 31, large river species at 34, pool species at 55, riffle species at 11, and pool-riffle species at 21. Overall, this refuge had the largest total catch at 14,546 fish, species diversity at 91 species and 22 families, Minnesota listed and limited distribution species at 4 and 10 respectively, and Wisconsin listed species at 8.
Table 2. Minnesota refuges overall species list. Codes for status, niches, and refuges follow table.
COMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAME |
STATUS |
NICHES |
REFUGES |
LAMPREYS - PETROMYZONTIDAE |
chestnut lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus |
IA MB |
PA |
I |
silver lamprey Ichthyomyzon unicuspis |
|
PA CN LR B |
I |
American brook lamprey Lampetra appendix |
IA LD ON |
FF CN I HW P |
I |
STURGEONS - ACIPENSERIDAE |
shovelnose sturgeon Scaphirhynchus platorynchus |
LD ND |
IN SL LR P |
I |
PADDLEFISHES - POLYODONTIDAE |
paddlefish Polyodon spathula |
MN WI ND ON |
FF SL LR PR |
I |
GARS - LEPISOSTEIDAE |
longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus |
|
TC SM LR P |
I |
shortnose gar Lepisosteus platostomus |
ND |
TC SM LR P |
DI |
BOWFINS - AMIIDAE |
bowfin Amia calva |
|
TC CC LR P |
DFGI |
MOONEYES - HIODONTIDAE |
goldeye Hiodon alosoides |
ON WI |
IN SM LR PR I |
|
mooneye Hiodon tergisus |
ON |
IN SM LR PR I |
|
HERRINGS - CLUPEIDAE |
gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum |
|
FF SM P |
DI |
MINNOWS - CYPRINIDAE |
central stoneroller
Campostoma anomalum |
ND ON |
HE CN PR |
BDGI |
spotfin shiner
Cyprinella spiloptera |
|
IN SM PR |
DGI |
common carp
Cyprinus carpio |
EX |
OM T SM P |
B-GI |
brassy minnow
Hybognathus hankinsoni |
|
HE SM P |
B-EGI |
Mississippi silvery minnow
Hybognathus nuchalis |
LD |
HE I SM LR P |
I |
common shinerLuxilus cornutus |
|
IN SL P |
A-CGH |
speckled chub
Macrhybopsis aestivalis |
LD WI |
IN I SM LR R |
I |
silver chub
Macrhybopsis storeriana |
ON |
IN SM LR P |
I |
pearl dace
Margariscus margarita |
IA SD ND |
IN I CN PR |
A |
hornyhead chub
Nocomis biguttatus |
ND |
IN I CN PR |
BCGH |
golden shiner
Notemigonus crysoleucas |
|
IN SM P |
AD-I |
emerald shiner
Notropis atherinoides |
|
IN SL LR P |
BDI |
river shiner
Notropis blennius |
ND |
IN SL LR P |
I |
bigmouth shiner
Notropis dorsalis |
|
IN SM PR |
B-DG-I |
blackchin shiner
Notropis heterodon |
MB |
IN I SM P |
HI |
blacknose shiner
Notropis heterolepis |
IA ND |
IN I SM P |
AGH |
spottail shiner
Notropis hudsonius |
|
IN I SM LR P |
BG-I |
rosyface shiner
Notropis rubellus |
MB ND |
IN I SL R |
B |
sand shiner
Notropis stramineus
|
|
IN SM PR |
BDI |
weed shiner Notropis texanus |
WI IA |
HE I LR P |
DI |
mimic shiner
Notropis volucellus |
|
IN I SM LR PR |
HI |
channel shiner
Notropis wickliffi |
WI |
IN LR |
I |
pugnose minnow
Opsopoeodus emiliae |
LD WI IA ON |
IN SM LR P |
I |
northern redbelly dace
Phoxinus eos |
SD ND |
HE SM HW P |
AE-H |
finescale dace
Phoxinus neogaeus |
SD ND |
IN SM HW P |
AF |
bluntnose minnow
Pimephales notatus |
|
OM CC PN PR B-DG-I |
|
fathead minnow
Pimephales promelas |
|
OM T CC PN PR |
A-I |
bullhead minnow
Pimephales vigilax |
LD |
OM CC LR P |
I |
blacknose dace
Rhinichthys atratulus |
|
GE SL HW R |
B-DG-I |
longnose dace
Rhinichthys cataractae |
|
IN I SL R |
CGI |
creek chub
Semotilus atromaculatus |
|
GE T CN PN PR |
B-DF-I |
SUCKERS - CATOSTOMIDAE |
river carpsucker
Carpiodes carpio |
|
OM SM LR P |
I |
quillback
Carpiodes cyprinus |
ON |
OM SM P |
DI |
highfin carpsucker
Carpiodes velifer |
|
OM I SM LR P |
I |
white sucker
Catostomus commersoni |
|
OM T SL PR |
A-I |
blue sucker
Cycleptus elongatus |
MN WI ND |
IN I SL LR R |
I |
northern hog sucker
Hypentelium nigricans |
ON |
IN I SL R |
I |
smallmouth buffalo
Ictiobus bubalus |
|
IN SM LR P |
DI |
bigmouth buffalo
Ictiobus cyprinellus |
MB ON |
IN SM LR P |
DI |
spotted sucker
Minytrema melanops |
LD ON |
IN I SL LR P |
I |
silver redhorse
Moxostoma anisurum |
|
IN SL LR P |
I |
river redhorse
Moxostoma carinatum |
LD WI ON |
IN I SL LR P |
I |
golden redhorse
Moxostoma erythrurum |
MB ON |
IN SL P |
I |
shorthead redhorse
Moxostoma macrolepidotum |
|
IN SL LR P |
A-EGI |
greater redhorse
Moxostoma valenciennesi |
LD WI ND |
IN I SL P |
B |
BULLHEAD CATFISHES - ICTALURIDAE |
black bullhead
Ameiurus melas |
ON |
IN T CC P |
A-I |
yellow bullhead
Ameiurus natalis |
ND |
IN CC P |
B-EG-I |
brown bullhead
Ameiurus nebulosus |
|
IN CC P |
CDF-I |
channel catfish
Ictalurus punctatus |
|
TC CC LR P |
I |
stonecat Noturus flavus |
|
IN I CC R |
BI |
tadpole madtom
Noturus gyrinus |
|
IN CC PR |
B-DF-I |
flathead catfish
Pylodictis olivaris |
ND |
TC CC LR PR |
I |
PIKES - ESOCIDAE |
northern pike
Esox lucius |
|
TC SM P |
B-I |
MUDMINNOWS - UMBRIDAE |
central mudminnow
Umbra limi |
SD ND |
IN CC P |
A-I |
TROUTS - SALMONIDAE |
brown trout
Salmo trutta |
EX |
TC CN PR |
DI |
brook trout
Salvelinus fontinalis |
|
TC I CN PR |
I |
TROUT-PERCHES - PERCOPSIDAE |
|
|
|
trout-perch
Percopsis omiscomaycus
|
SD |
IN SM P |
I |
PIRATE PERCHES - APHREDODERIDAE |
pirate perch
Aphredoderus sayanus |
MN WI IA |
IN SM P |
I |
CODFISHES - GADIDAE |
burbot
Lota lota |
IA |
TC SL PR |
CFI |
KILLIFISHES - CYPRINODONTIDAE |
banded killifish
Fundulus diaphanus |
SD ND MB |
IN I SM P |
DH |
SILVERSIDES - ATHERINIDAE |
brook silverside
Labidesthes sicculus |
ON |
IN SM LR P |
I |
STICKLEBACKS - GASTEROSTEIDAE |
brook stickleback
Culaea inconstans |
|
IN CC HW P |
A-I |
TEMPERATE BASSES - PERCICHTHYIDAE |
white bass
Morone chrysops |
|
TC SM LR P |
I |
SUNFISHES - CENTRARCHIDAE |
rock bass
Ambloplites rupestris |
|
TC I CC P |
BCG-I |
green sunfish
Lepomis cyanellus |
|
IN CC PN P |
BDEG-I |
pumpkinseed
Lepomis gibbosus |
|
IN CC P |
B-EG-I |
warmouth
Lepomis gulosus |
LD ON |
TC CC P |
I |
orangespotted sunfish
Lepomis humilis |
ON |
IN CC P |
BDI |
bluegill
Lepomis macrochirus |
|
IN CC P |
A-I |
smallmouth bass
Micropterus dolomieu |
|
TC I CC P |
CI |
largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides |
|
TC CC P |
A-DF-I |
white crappie
Pomoxis annularis |
ON |
TC CC P D |
I |
black crappie
Pomoxis nigromaculatus |
|
TC CC P |
ABDEG-I |
PERCHES - PERCIDAE |
crystal darter
Ammocrypta asprella |
MN WI |
IN I SL LR R |
I |
western sand darter
Ammocrypta clara |
LD WI IA |
IN I SL LR |
I |
mud darter
Etheostoma asprigene |
LD WI |
IN LR |
I |
Iowa darter
Etheostoma exile |
|
IN I SM P |
A-I |
fantail darter
Etheostoma flabellare |
|
IN CC HW R |
I |
johnny darter
Etheostoma nigrum |
|
IN CC PN PR |
A-DF-I |
banded darter
Etheostoma zonale |
|
IN I SL R |
I |
yellow perch
Perca flavescens |
|
IN SM P |
BCE-I |
logperch
Percina caprodes |
ND |
IN SL PR |
CDG-I |
blackside darter
Percina maculata |
ON |
IN SL PR |
BDGI |
slenderhead darter
Percina phoxocephala |
|
IN I SL LR R |
DI |
river darter
Percina shumardi |
ND ON |
IN SL LR R |
I |
sauger
Stizostedion canadense |
|
TC SL LR P |
I |
walleye
Stizostedion vitreum
|
|
TC SL LR P |
DEI |
DRUMS SCIAENIDAE |
freshwater drum
Aplodinotus grunniens |
|
IN SM LR P |
DI |
Niches |
Status |
Refuges |
CC - Complex/Parental Care |
EX - Exotic Species |
A - Agassiz |
P - Pools |
IA - Listed in Iowa |
B - Big Stone |
CN - Complex/No Care |
LD - Limited Distribution (MN) |
C - Crane Meadows |
PA - Parasite |
MB - Listed in Manitoba |
D - Minnesota Valley |
FF - Filter Feeder |
MN - Listed in Minnesota |
E - Morris Wetland |
PN - Pioneer |
ND - Listed in North Dakota |
F - Rice Lake |
GE - Generalist Feeder |
ON - Listed in Ontario |
G - Sherburne |
PR - Pools/Riffles |
SD - Listed in South Dakota |
H - Tamarac |
HE - Herbivore |
WI - Listed in North Dakota |
I - Upper Mississippi |
R - Riffles |
|
|
HW - Headwater |
|
|
SL - Simple Lithophil |
|
|
I - Intolerant |
|
|
SM - Simple/Miscellaneous |
|
|
IN - Insectivore |
|
|
T - Tolerant |
|
|
LR - Large River |
|
|
TC - Top Carnivore |
|
|
OM - Omnivore |
|
|
Recommendations
Standardized surveys should be conducted on a regular basis, perhaps every 10 years, and the IBI should be applied to assess and monitor the environmental quality of all aquatic habitats. The IBI methodology has been evolving from strictly warmwater streams to now include new metrics and more are under development for trout streams (coldwater), impoundments, and lakes.
References
--------. 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
Lyons, J. 1992. Using the index of biotic integrity (IBI) to measure environmental quality in warmwater streams of Wisconsin. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-149.St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Exp. Station. 51 p.
Schmidt, K. 1996. Endangered, threatened, and special status fishes of North America. North American Native Fishes Association. 65 p.
|