The Native Fish Conservancy
  Members
    Login
    Join Now!
    Membership Info

  Sections
    Home
    Articles
    The Darter - Newsletter
    NFC Forum
    NFC TV
    Photo Gallery
    NFC Store
    Joe Tomelleri Store

  Grants & Programs
    Adopt a Tank
    Blue Pike
    Exotics Fish Tourny
    Grant History
    Sustainable Aquaculture
    Web Fund

 
Fish Communities of Minnesota National Wildlife Refuges
by Konrad Schmidt - St. Paul, MN

In 1983, my interest in native fishes and unusual species distributions led me to the Upper Mississippi National Wildlife and Fish Refuge in southeastern Minnesota. The sparse information available at that time indicated this portion of the Mississippi River, backwaters, and tributaries supported many fishes at the northern limits of their ranges. My initial forays were extremely limited in scope and targeted very few species. The bluntnose darter (Etheostoma chlorosomum), which had not been reported from Minnesota waters in four decades, was the Holy Grail of my early quests. Even though no one has since found this species, my efforts did sample several fishes which I had never collected before and also established new localities for others listed endangered, threatened, or special concern in Minnesota and Wisconsin.

In 1985, I landed a seasonal job with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) conducting fish surveys in waterfowl production areas (WPA). The objective of this study was to identify units with large rough fish populations (usually carp and bullheads) which had degraded waterfowl habitat and water quality by grazing and uprooting submerged plants and increasing turbidity. Definitely not the most glamourous job for a fish biolo gist, but I loved it and felt like a pioneer on a frontier exploring places which had never been surveyed. The experience also made me keenly aware of the lack of information available for nongame species which typically comprise the bulk of all fish communities. This spawned an idea to begin fish surveys on large tracts of public lands which contained aquatic habitats and refuges topped my list of likely candidates. However, nongame species to this day remain a low priority in the funding forum which required tapping an all too common source - OOPS: Out of Pocket Support.

Generally, each refuge was sampled twice (spring and fall) with seines, kicknets, and minnow traps. Back pack electroshockers were used in rip-rapped areas. However, the Upper Mississippi River remains an ongoing study because of the unique species found there. I also received some welcomed assistance in this refuge from U.S. Fish and Service and Minnesota and Wisconsin DNR fisheries biologists who brought their boom shocking boats. Voucher specimens of every species collected in surveys conducted since 1990 have been deposited in the James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History fish collection which is housed on the St. Paul campus of the University of Minnesota. Finally, field data and narrative reports of survey results have been provided to refuge headquarters at the completion of each study.

Refuge Summaries


Eight refuges and one wetland district were surveyed from 1983 through 1996 (See map). This included 644 samples conduct ed over 216 days in 18 major watersheds, 16 Minnesota counties, and 5 Wisconsin counties.


  • Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge is in northwestern Minnesota near Thief River Falls. The refuge was established in 1937 and encompasses 61,449 acres. Aquatic habitats consist of 19 impoundments, 5 lakes, and channelized reaches of the Thief and Mud Rivers.
  • Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge is in west-central Minnesota near Ortonville on the South Dakota border. The refuge was established in 1971 and encompasses 10,795 acres. Aquatic habitats include the Minnesota River, tributary streams, wetlands, impoundments, and abandoned granite quarries.
  • Crane Meadows National Wildlife Refuge is in central Minnesota near Little Falls. The refuge was established in 1993 and will eventually encompass 13,540 acres. Aquatic habitats include Rice and Skunk Lakes, Platte River, and Buckman, Little Rock, Rice, and Skunk Creeks.
  • Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge is headquartered in Bloomington which is part of the Twin Cities Metro Area. The refuge was established in 1976 and will eventually encompass 24,000 acres along the lower 72 miles of the Minnesota River from Le Sueur to Fort Snelling State Park. Aquatic habitats include the mainstem Minnesota River (natural and navigation channels and associated cutoffs) and floodplain marshes, lakes, and tributary streams.
  • The Morris Wetland District is headquartered near Morris in west-central Minnesota. The district was established in 1963, and in 1985, encompassed approximately 42,000 acres scattered over 266 WPAs in Big Stone, Lac qui Parle, Pope, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, and Yellow Medicine Counties. Aquatic habitats include swamps, marsh, and lakes which have closed basins or connected to drainages via streams and ditches. Note: Surveys were conducted solely with passive gears (i.e., gillnets, trapnets, and minnow traps) and in only 40 WPAs which included five of the district's seven counties.
  • Rice Lake National Wildlife Refuge is in east-central Minnesota near McGregor. The refuge was established in 1935 and encompasses 18,127 acres. Aquatic habitats include the 4,500 acre Rice Lake, several miles of the Rice River, impoundments, small lakes, and wetlands.
  • Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge is in central Minnesota near Princeton. The refuge was established in 1965 and encompasses approximately 30,600 acres. Aquatic habitats include Battle Brook, several miles of the St. Francis River, channelized Snake River, and 23 impoundments.
  • Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge is in northwestern Minnesota near Detroit Lakes. The refuge was established in 1938 and encompasses approximately 43,000 acres. Aquatic habitats include the Buffalo and Otter Tail Rivers and several lakes, wetlands, and impoundments.
  • The Upper Mississippi River Wildlife and Fish Refuge is headquartered in Winona in southeastern Minnesota. The refuge was established in 1924 and encompasses 195,000 acres which spans 284 miles of the Mississippi River from Wabasha, MN to Rock Island, IL. Aquatic habitats include the mainstem Mississippi River (navigation channel and pools), floodplain backwaters, and tributary streams. Note: Surveys were conducted in this refuge from the confluence of Wisconsin's Chippewa River to the Minnesota-Iowa border. However, this does include 1987 surveys from the adjacent Trempealeau National Wildlife Refuge in Wisconsin and were conducted while I was employed with the USFWS - Winona Fisheries Resources Office.


Ecological Niches

Before diving in, a brief course in ecology is in order to understand the scope of this information. Whether the topic is aquatic or terrestrial ecosystems, each species plays several roles or fills many niches in a community. Although there is never universal consensus among biologists when classifying species to specific groups, both empty and filled niches can tell a great deal about the overall health of a community and the quality of the habitat it depends on. The Index of biotic integrity (IBI) examines several facets or metrics of fish communities to assess stream water quality and habitat. In order to use this relatively new toy, biologists must be cornered and pinned down to put a label on many species. This always require some fine tuning, but does provide the tools to eventually score streams from pristine to poor. The niches I looked at were not all environmental indicators, but included tolerance, feeding, spawning, and preferred stream size and habitat.


  • TOLERANCE: A community comprised of several species intolerant to pollution, siltation, turbidity, and habitat modification (e.g., channelizaton) would reflect high quality conditions. However, another community dominated with one or two tolerant species would indicate severely degraded conditions.
  • FEEDING: Groups include omnivores, insectivores, top carnivores, filter feeders, generalist feeders, and parasites. Omnivores can suffice on a diverse diet which includes both plants and animals and serves as an advantage in degraded conditions with a disrupted food base. Insectivores have a much more restricted diet which is dependent on a healthy aquatic insect community and their habitat. Top carnivores which are also called piscivores feed on other vertebrates (e.g., fish) and crayfish and occupy the highest level in a healthy community's food chain. Filter feeders are planktivores which sieve small plants and animals from the water column. Generalist feeders are sometimes also referred to as generalist invertivores whose diet is often high in animal matter. However, these species possess the same advantage as omnivores in adapting to a broader range of items when degrading conditions disrupt the food base. Herbivores are the grazers in the fish community and feed on plants and algae. Parasites are restricted to the parasitic lampreys which extracts a blood meal from another fish which serves as an unwilling host.
  • SPAWNING: Groups include simple lithophilous, simple miscellaneous, complex - parental care, and complex - no care. Simple lithophils broadcast their eggs which come in contact with and develop in bottom substrates. These eggs require clean gravel or cobble for successful reproduction and simple lithophilic species decline in streams with heavy silt loads. Simple miscellaneous spawners have buoyant, adhesive, or fast developing eggs which have little or no contact with substrates. Both complex spawners either build nests or lay adhesive eggs on the undersurfaces of rocks and are also not dependent on clean substrates.
  • PREFERRED STREAM SIZE AND HABITAT: Even though there is overlap, many fishes typically inhabit specific parts of a watershed from small headwaters streams to large rivers. The same general rule applies to habitats where certain fishes prefer riffles, others pools, and some both. Finally pioneers are the first species to re-invade suitable habitats following a disturbance (e.g., drought or fish kill).

    Results

    Overall, the surveys sampled 63,622 fish representing 100 species in 23 families. This included four Minnesota and eight Wisconsin fishes listed endangered, threatened, or special concern; and 11 species which have very limited distributions in Minnesota (Tables 1 and 2). The following community descriptions are summaries and only species comprising major components of each group are reported. For more detailed information on species composition, narrative reports and data summaries should be requested from the refuge headquarters. However, a nominal fee may be charged to cover photocopying and postage costs.










































































































































































































    Table 1. Fish community overview for Minnesota refuges and waterfowl production areas. The first number represents the species total and the second is percent composition of the total catch. * - Environmental indicator frequently used for the Index of Biotic Integrity.
    AGASSIZ BIG STONE CRANE MEADOWS
    ECOLOGICAL NICHE:
    FEEDING
    Filter Feeder - - -
    Generalist Feeder - 2 - 7.6 2 - 4.2
    Herbivore 1 - 2.5 2 - 7.8 -
    Insectivore* 11 - 72.7 23 - 44.1 17 - 63.1
    Omnivore* 3 - 24.8 4 - 39.1 4 - 5.9
    Parasite - - -
    Top Carnivore* 2 - <0.1 4 - 1.1 5 - 26.8
    SPAWNING
    Complex Spawner (Parental Care) 8 - 92.9 16 - 64.3 14 - 68.2
    Complex Spawner (No Parental Care) 1 - 0.1 3 - 15.5 2 - 5.1
    Simple Lithophilic Spawner* 3 - 0.7 8 - 10.0 7 - 19.1
    Simple Miscellaneous Spawner 5 - 6.3 8 - 10.0 5 - 7.6
    TOLERANCE
    Intolerant* 2 - 0.6 7 - 7.1 5 - 25.8
    Tolerant* 3 - 24.8 5 - 42.9 5 - 9.9
    STREAM SIZE
    Headwater 3 - 68.7 2 - 3.0 2 - 3.5
    Large River 1 - 0.1 3 - 0.5 1 - 0.5
    Pioneer 2 - 24.2 5 - 53.2 4 - 17.4
    PREFERRED HABITAT
    Pool 14 - 75.2 21 - 30.7 16 - 63.4
    Riffle - 3 - 2.8 2 - 2.0
    Pool and Riffle 3 - 24.8 11 - 66.2 10 - 34.6
    OVERALL RESULTS
    Families 7 8 9
    Species 17 35 28
    Exotics - 1 - 0.5 1 - 0.4
    Total Catch 10152 2011 1441
    Minnesota Listed Fishes - - -
    Minnesota Limited Fishes - 1 -
    Wisconsin Listed Fishes - - -
    Samples 39 35 21
    Year(s) 1994 1992 1996









































































































































































































    Table 1. Continued.
    Minnesota Valley Morris Wetland Rice Lake
    Ecological Niche
    FEEDING
    Filter Feeder 1 - 0.2 - -
    Generalist Feeder 2 - 2.2 - 1 - 0.1
    Herbivore 3 - 1.1 2 - 1.3 1 - 65.4
    Insectivore* 24 - 62.4 9 - 50.7 10 - 19.8
    Omnivore* 6 - 32.6 4 - 44.0 3 - 10.8
    Parasite - - -
    Top Carnivore* 8 - 1.5 3 - 4.0 4 - 3.4
    SPAWNING
    Complex Spawner (Parental Care) 17 - 33.3 9 - 95.5 10 - 27.0
    Complex Spawner (No Parental Care) 3 - 2.2 - 1 - 0.1
    Simple Lithophilic Spawner* 8 - 16.7 2 - 0.5 2 - 2.7
    Simple Miscellaneous Spawner
    15 - 47.7 7 - 4.0 6 - 69.7
    TOLERANCE
    Intolerant* 4 - 16.0 1 - 0.1 1 - 0.4
    Tolerant* 5 - 33.7 4 - 82.2 4 - 13.3
    STREAM SIZE
    Headwater 2 - 4.9 2 - 12.0 2 - 66.7
    Large River 9 - 16.5 1 - 0.4 1 - 0.1
    Pioneer 5 - 19.0 2 - 42.3 3 - 10.9
    PREFERRED HABITAT
    Pool 29 - 80.4 16 - 57.6 13 - 85.7
    Riffle 2 - 1.2 - -
    Pool and Riffle 13 - 18.4 2 - 42.4 6 -13.8
    OVERALL RESULTS
    Families 14 8 10
    Species 44 18 19
    Exotics 2 - 22.7 1 - 1.5 -
    Total Catch 5013 10549 1859
    Minnesota Listed Fishes - - -
    Minnesota Limited Fishes - - -
    Wisconsin Listed Fishes - - -
    Samples 28 38 38
    Year(s) 1990 1985 1993










































































































































































































    Table 1. Continued.
    Sherburne Tamarac Upper Mississippi
    Ecological Niche
    FEEDING
    Filter Feeder - - 3 - 3.3
    Generalist Feeder 2 - 0.7 2 - 11.0 2 - 3.2
    Herbivore 3 - 23.6 1 - 2.6 4 - 0.6
    Insectivore* 22 - 52.1 21 - 53.8 52 - 66.1
    Omnivore* 5 - 22.2 4 - 31.6 9 - 7.4
    Parasite - - 2 - 0.1
    Top Carnivore* 5 - 1.4 4 - 1.0 19 - 17.8
    SPAWNING
    Complex Spawner (Parental Care) 16 - 58.4 15 - 50.5 25 - 36.8
    Complex Spawner (No Parental Care) 3 - 0.9 2 - 5.8 6 - 2.7
    Simple Lithophilic Spawner* 7 - 4.1 4 - 11.3 24 - 29.5
    Simple Miscellaneous Spawner 11 - 36.6 11 - 32.3 31 - 25.8
    TOLERANCE
    Intolerant* 6 - 3.7 8 - 25.5 22 - 8.8
    Tolerant* 5 - 47.2 4 - 34.6 5 - 8.0
    STREAM SIZE
    Headwater 3 - 24.9 3 - 19.1 4 - 2.5
    Large River 3 - 0.2 1 - <0.1 34 - 37.7
    Pioneer

    5 - 15.1 5 - 36.7 5 - 6.2
    PREFERRED HABITAT
    Pool 23 - 80.5 21 - 55.0 55 - 75.9
    Riffle 2 - 0.7 1 - 6.1 11 - 2.3
    Pool and Riffle 12 - 18.7 10 - 38.7 21 - 17.1
    OVERALL RESULTS
    Families 9 9 22
    Species 37 32 91
    Exotics 1 - 5.6 - 2 - 2.0
    Total Catch 13552 4499 14546
    Minnesota Listed Fishes - - 4
    Minnesota Limited Fishes - - 10
    Wisconsin Listed Fishes - - 8
    Samples 156 64 225
    Year(s) 1988-1989 1992 1983-1996


    The Agassiz fish community had the greatest composition of insectivores at 72.7% and headwater species at 68.7%. However, brook sticklebacks were the dominant species in both groups. Other major groups included the complex spawners - parental care at 92.9% (fathead minnows and brook sticklebacks) and pool species at 75.2% (brook sticklebacks). Overall, the refuge surveys sampled 10,152 fish representing 17 species in 7 families

    Big Stone's fish community had the most complex spawners - no care at 15.5% (central stoneroller, hornyhead chub, and creek chub), pioneers at 53.2%, and pool-riffle species at 66.2% with fathead minnows dominating both groups. Omnivores were also highly represented at 39.1% (fathead minnows). Overall, 2011 fish were sampled representing 35 species in 8 families. This included the greater redhorse which has a limited distribution in Minnesota and was collected in the Yellow Bank River.

    Crane Meadows edged out Tamarac in composition of intolerant species at 25.8% and the most top carnivores at 26.8% with rock bass representing the majority in both groups. Insectivores were also abundant at 63.1% (central mudminnows, johnny darters, common shiners, and tadpole madtoms). Overall, 1441 fish were sampled representing 28 species in 9 families.

    Minnesota Valley had the largest percentage of exotics at 22.7% (common carp). However, insectivores (emerald shiners and Iowa darters), large river species (emerald shiners), and pool species (emeralds, Iowas, and carp) were also common at 62.4%, 16.5%, and 80.4% respectively. Overall, 5013 fish were sampled representing 44 species in 14 families. This includes the unusual occurrence of the weed shiner in the lower Minnesota River at the mouth of Rilely Creek. Note: Additional 1994 surveys were conducted in Eagle Creek, but these results are not reported in the refuge narrative or overall species list (Table 2). Significant finds include the American brook lamprey (Lampetra appendix) which had not been reported from the Minnesota drainage in half a century, and the burbot, which the Bell Museum's fish collection revealed was the first occurrence of this species reported from the drainage.

    The Morris Wetland District had the highest composition of tolerant species at 82.2% (fathead minnows and black bullheads), omnivores at 44.0% (fatheads), and complex spawners - parental care at 95.5% (fatheads, black bullheads, and brook sticklebacks). Overall, 10,549 fish were sampled representing 18 species in 8 families.

    Rice Lake had the most herbivores at 65.4%, simple miscellaneous spawners at 69.7%, and pool species at 85.7% with northern redbelly dace dominating all three groups. Headwater species at 66.7% was another major component in this community, but again, represented by the same fish. Overall, 1859 fish were sampled and represented 19 species in 10 families.

    Sherburne had a large pool component at 80.5% with northern redbelly dace and black bullheads comprising the bulk of the group. Overall, the surveys, which spanned two years, sampled 13,552 fish representing 37 species in 9 families.

    Tamarac had the most generalist feeders at 11.0% (creek chubs) and riffle species at 6.1% (blacknose dace). Intolerant species were also well represented at 8 fishes and 25.5% of the total catch (Iowa darters). This was second only to the Upper Mississippi in species and Crane Meadows in composition. Overall, 4499 fish were sampled representing 32 species in 9 families.


    The Upper Mississippi had the greatest abundance of filter feeders at 3.3% (gizzard shad), insectivores at 66.1% (emerald shiners and bluegills), parasites at 0.1% (chestnut and silver lampreys), top carnivores at 17.8% (largemouth bass), simple lithophilic spawners at 29.5% and large river species at 37.7.0% (emerald shiners in both groups). In numbers, this refuge also had the most intolerant species at 22, filter feeders at 3, insectivores at 52, omnivores at 9, top carnivores at 19, both complex spawners: parental care at 25, and no care at 6, simple lithophilous spawners at 24, simple miscellaneous spawners at 31, large river species at 34, pool species at 55, riffle species at 11, and pool-riffle species at 21. Overall, this refuge had the largest total catch at 14,546 fish, species diversity at 91 species and 22 families, Minnesota listed and limited distribution species at 4 and 10 respectively, and Wisconsin listed species at 8.


































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































    Table 2. Minnesota refuges overall species list. Codes for status, niches, and refuges follow table.
    COMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS NICHES REFUGES
    LAMPREYS - PETROMYZONTIDAE
    chestnut lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus IA MB PA I
    silver lamprey Ichthyomyzon unicuspis PA CN LR B I
    American brook lamprey Lampetra appendix IA LD ON FF CN I HW P I
    STURGEONS - ACIPENSERIDAE
    shovelnose sturgeon Scaphirhynchus platorynchus LD ND IN SL LR P I
    PADDLEFISHES - POLYODONTIDAE
    paddlefish Polyodon spathula MN WI ND ON FF SL LR PR I
    GARS - LEPISOSTEIDAE
    longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus TC SM LR P I
    shortnose gar Lepisosteus platostomus ND TC SM LR P DI
    BOWFINS - AMIIDAE
    bowfin Amia calva TC CC LR P DFGI
    MOONEYES - HIODONTIDAE
    goldeye Hiodon alosoides ON WI IN SM LR PR I
    mooneye Hiodon tergisus ON IN SM LR PR I
    HERRINGS - CLUPEIDAE
    gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum FF SM P DI
    MINNOWS - CYPRINIDAE
    central stoneroller
    Campostoma anomalum
    ND ON HE CN PR BDGI
    spotfin shiner
    Cyprinella spiloptera
    IN SM PR DGI
    common carp
    Cyprinus carpio
    EX OM T SM P B-GI
    brassy minnow
    Hybognathus hankinsoni
    HE SM P B-EGI
    Mississippi silvery minnow
    Hybognathus nuchalis
    LD HE I SM LR P I
    common shinerLuxilus cornutus IN SL P A-CGH
    speckled chub
    Macrhybopsis aestivalis
    LD WI IN I SM LR R I
    silver chub
    Macrhybopsis storeriana
    ON IN SM LR P I
    pearl dace
    Margariscus margarita
    IA SD ND IN I CN PR A
    hornyhead chub
    Nocomis biguttatus
    ND IN I CN PR BCGH
    golden shiner
    Notemigonus crysoleucas
    IN SM P AD-I
    emerald shiner
    Notropis atherinoides
    IN SL LR P BDI
    river shiner
    Notropis blennius
    ND IN SL LR P I
    bigmouth shiner
    Notropis dorsalis
    IN SM PR B-DG-I
    blackchin shiner
    Notropis heterodon
    MB IN I SM P HI
    blacknose shiner
    Notropis heterolepis
    IA ND IN I SM P AGH
    spottail shiner
    Notropis hudsonius
    IN I SM LR P BG-I
    rosyface shiner
    Notropis rubellus
    MB ND IN I SL R B
    sand shiner
    Notropis stramineus
    IN SM PR BDI
    weed shiner Notropis texanus WI IA HE I LR P DI
    mimic shiner
    Notropis volucellus
    IN I SM LR PR HI
    channel shiner
    Notropis wickliffi
    WI IN LR I
    pugnose minnow
    Opsopoeodus emiliae
    LD WI IA ON IN SM LR P I
    northern redbelly dace
    Phoxinus eos
    SD ND HE SM HW P AE-H
    finescale dace
    Phoxinus neogaeus
    SD ND IN SM HW P AF
    bluntnose minnow
    Pimephales notatus
    OM CC PN PR B-DG-I
    fathead minnow
    Pimephales promelas
    OM T CC PN PR A-I
    bullhead minnow
    Pimephales vigilax
    LD OM CC LR P I
    blacknose dace
    Rhinichthys atratulus
    GE SL HW R B-DG-I
    longnose dace
    Rhinichthys cataractae
    IN I SL R CGI
    creek chub
    Semotilus atromaculatus
    GE T CN PN PR B-DF-I
    SUCKERS - CATOSTOMIDAE
    river carpsucker
    Carpiodes carpio
    OM SM LR P I
    quillback
    Carpiodes cyprinus
    ON OM SM P DI
    highfin carpsucker
    Carpiodes velifer
    OM I SM LR P I
    white sucker
    Catostomus commersoni
    OM T SL PR A-I
    blue sucker
    Cycleptus elongatus
    MN WI ND IN I SL LR R I
    northern hog sucker
    Hypentelium nigricans
    ON IN I SL R I
    smallmouth buffalo
    Ictiobus bubalus
    IN SM LR P DI
    bigmouth buffalo
    Ictiobus cyprinellus
    MB ON IN SM LR P DI
    spotted sucker
    Minytrema melanops
    LD ON IN I SL LR P I
    silver redhorse
    Moxostoma anisurum
    IN SL LR P I
    river redhorse
    Moxostoma carinatum
    LD WI ON IN I SL LR P I
    golden redhorse
    Moxostoma erythrurum
    MB ON IN SL P I
    shorthead redhorse
    Moxostoma macrolepidotum
    IN SL LR P A-EGI
    greater redhorse
    Moxostoma valenciennesi
    LD WI ND IN I SL P B
    BULLHEAD CATFISHES - ICTALURIDAE
    black bullhead
    Ameiurus melas
    ON IN T CC P A-I
    yellow bullhead
    Ameiurus natalis
    ND IN CC P B-EG-I
    brown bullhead
    Ameiurus nebulosus
    IN CC P CDF-I
    channel catfish
    Ictalurus punctatus
    TC CC LR P I
    stonecat Noturus flavus IN I CC R BI
    tadpole madtom
    Noturus gyrinus
    IN CC PR B-DF-I
    flathead catfish
    Pylodictis olivaris
    ND TC CC LR PR I
    PIKES - ESOCIDAE

    northern pike
    Esox lucius
    TC SM P B-I
    MUDMINNOWS - UMBRIDAE

    central mudminnow
    Umbra limi
    SD ND IN CC P A-I
    TROUTS - SALMONIDAE

    brown trout
    Salmo trutta
    EX TC CN PR DI
    brook trout
    Salvelinus fontinalis
    TC I CN PR I
    TROUT-PERCHES - PERCOPSIDAE

    trout-perch
    Percopsis omiscomaycus
    SD IN SM P I
    PIRATE PERCHES - APHREDODERIDAE

    pirate perch
    Aphredoderus sayanus
    MN WI IA IN SM P I
    CODFISHES - GADIDAE

    burbot
    Lota lota
    IA TC SL PR CFI
    KILLIFISHES - CYPRINODONTIDAE

    banded killifish
    Fundulus diaphanus
    SD ND MB IN I SM P DH
    SILVERSIDES - ATHERINIDAE
    brook silverside
    Labidesthes sicculus
    ON IN SM LR P I
    STICKLEBACKS - GASTEROSTEIDAE

    brook stickleback
    Culaea inconstans
    IN CC HW P A-I
    TEMPERATE BASSES - PERCICHTHYIDAE

    white bass
    Morone chrysops
    TC SM LR P I
    SUNFISHES - CENTRARCHIDAE

    rock bass
    Ambloplites rupestris
    TC I CC P BCG-I
    green sunfish
    Lepomis cyanellus
    IN CC PN P BDEG-I
    pumpkinseed
    Lepomis gibbosus
    IN CC P B-EG-I
    warmouth
    Lepomis gulosus
    LD ON TC CC P I
    orangespotted sunfish
    Lepomis humilis
    ON IN CC P BDI
    bluegill
    Lepomis macrochirus
    IN CC P A-I
    smallmouth bass
    Micropterus dolomieu
    TC I CC P CI
    largemouth bass
    Micropterus salmoides
    TC CC P A-DF-I
    white crappie
    Pomoxis annularis
    ON TC CC P D I
    black crappie
    Pomoxis nigromaculatus
    TC CC P ABDEG-I
    PERCHES - PERCIDAE

    crystal darter
    Ammocrypta asprella
    MN WI IN I SL LR R I
    western sand darter
    Ammocrypta clara
    LD WI IA IN I SL LR I
    mud darter
    Etheostoma asprigene
    LD WI IN LR I
    Iowa darter
    Etheostoma exile
    IN I SM P A-I
    fantail darter
    Etheostoma flabellare
    IN CC HW R I
    johnny darter
    Etheostoma nigrum
    IN CC PN PR A-DF-I
    banded darter
    Etheostoma zonale
    IN I SL R I
    yellow perch
    Perca flavescens
    IN SM P BCE-I
    logperch
    Percina caprodes
    ND IN SL PR CDG-I
    blackside darter
    Percina maculata
    ON IN SL PR BDGI
    slenderhead darter
    Percina phoxocephala
    IN I SL LR R DI
    river darter
    Percina shumardi
    ND ON IN SL LR R I
    sauger
    Stizostedion canadense
    TC SL LR P I
    walleye
    Stizostedion vitreum
    TC SL LR P DEI
    DRUMS SCIAENIDAE
    freshwater drum
    Aplodinotus grunniens
    IN SM LR P DI






































































































    Niches Status Refuges
    CC - Complex/Parental Care EX - Exotic Species A - Agassiz
    P - Pools IA - Listed in Iowa B - Big Stone
    CN - Complex/No Care LD - Limited Distribution (MN) C - Crane Meadows
    PA - Parasite MB - Listed in Manitoba D - Minnesota Valley
    FF - Filter Feeder MN - Listed in Minnesota E - Morris Wetland
    PN - Pioneer ND - Listed in North Dakota F - Rice Lake
    GE - Generalist Feeder ON - Listed in Ontario G - Sherburne
    PR - Pools/Riffles SD - Listed in South Dakota H - Tamarac
    HE - Herbivore WI - Listed in North Dakota I - Upper Mississippi
    R - Riffles
    HW - Headwater
    SL - Simple Lithophil
    I - Intolerant
    SM - Simple/Miscellaneous
    IN - Insectivore
    T - Tolerant
    LR - Large River
    TC - Top Carnivore
    OM - Omnivore

    Recommendations
    Standardized surveys should be conducted on a regular basis, perhaps every 10 years, and the IBI should be applied to assess and monitor the environmental quality of all aquatic habitats. The IBI methodology has been evolving from strictly warmwater streams to now include new metrics and more are under development for trout streams (coldwater), impoundments, and lakes.

    References


    --------. 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

    Lyons, J. 1992. Using the index of biotic integrity (IBI) to measure environmental quality in warmwater streams of Wisconsin. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-149.St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Exp. Station. 51 p.

    Schmidt, K. 1996. Endangered, threatened, and special status fishes of North America. North American Native Fishes Association. 65 p.